Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeRDP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FreeRDP[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been around since 2010 but it still has not a single robust, independent reference. All refs are blogs, download sites or technical info. There are many remote desktop applications around and this one seems no more notable than many others. It certainly fails WP:GNG as it stands. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article's content seems to initially have been derived from Rdesktop and is sharing a lot of information with the original. If this AfD proposal is going anywhere, there should be another one for Rdesktop, as it is in no better shape. Relevant information (mostly the information about the implemented feature set and protocol versions as it might be difficult to get at in a single source) might be migrated to the Remote Desktop Protocol#Non-Microsoft_implementations section after some refactoring there or possibly warrant a new Comparison Of Remote Desktop Clients for RDP article. Wabbiteer (talk) 10:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now perhaps at best as the currently listed sources seem acceptable at first but I'm not sure if this convinces the software notability guidelines and my searches also found nothing better than a few passing mentions. Draft and userfy if needed of course though, SwisterTwister talk 22:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:47, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches turned up press releases, trivial mentions, and wiki mirrors. No in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.