Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Graver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Graver[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:BIO. Non-notable life, not really noticed by third-party sources. ScienceApologist (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Finding very very little for third-party sources. Also, if this is not deleted, it should at the very least be heavily revised. Much of it fails WP:NPOV, and several of the edits are by Special:Contributions/Fredgraver -- should be checked for WP:COI and WP:OR. — GorillaWarfare ^{talk-review me!} 14:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Wow, missed that one. Cindamuse is right, he does seem to meet notability. I still stand by my point that it needs to be revised though, because it's heavily WP:POV and WP:OR. — GorillaWarfare ^{talk-review me!} 23:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Reply. I had to dig for it in the article and then through research. I agree with the Macworld columnist, this is a rather dry article for a comedian. LOL Cindamuse (talk) 23:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject of this article is a highly notable television producer and writer. He has been nominated for nine Emmy Awards, having been honored with three in his role as writer on Late Night with David Letterman. He is a distinguished member of the Writers Guild of America and is currently nominated to the council. Please see this article for more of his background, including media comments regarding the quality of this article. Cindamuse (talk) 15:12, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Cindamuse. Edward321 (talk) 15:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.