Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Ford (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Ford[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not think that this person meets the notability requirements. Chzz ► 08:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. His article looks a bit lacking, but he's well known within the industry. He has a solid list of works on MobyGames. Developer of a notable title in the history of the video game industry. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 15:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems the SC is a notable enough contribution for game legacy even per 1EVENT. I had a book that mentioned SC in a bit of detail; not sure if it mentioned Ford in particular. here's some good info. Although I can't find many more sources. Paul Reiche III is more notable. If it comes to deleting, then definitely Merge to SC. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 20:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – His credits and roles listed look good enough to me. –MuZemike 17:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I'm fine with it, but it needs to be expanded. Doc Quintana (talk) 18:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.