Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frany Dejota

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that there is insufficient coverage available in reliable sources to show that the subject is notable at this time. Mz7 (talk) 18:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frany Dejota[edit]

Frany Dejota (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by author without explanation. After searching for RSes, this fails GNG and MUSICBIO overall. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Amazon is not an reliable source. Could you please read WP:RS to explain we need independent third party sources? KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Similar story at pt. Wkipedia [2] Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment These accounts were misinterpreted and deliberately judged and eliminated as promotional but were not. This account has no promotional purposes nor intends to have, only information about the artist. Doug Weller Theroadislong Roumo Roumo (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Participate with the artist's page and contribute new data and references to build it properly so that it does not have a promotional aspect as it does not pretend to be, thank you! Doug Weller Theroadislong KGirlTrucker81 Roumo Roumo (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No one is saying it's promotional, it just has no indepth coverage in reliable sources and fails our notability guide and more pertinently WP:MUSICBIO Theroadislong (talk) 17:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verify relatible source. I oppose the elimination without meaning, help to make the artist's page verifiable. Roumo Roumo (talk) 17:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verify Frany Dejota. I oppose the elimination page 84.78.26.35 (talk) 18:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verify Do not delete the page, the artist is popular, respect and collaborate. 90.174.4.218 (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verify The biography was expanded and new references were added, reviewed and contributed, no delete the page, thank you. 84.78.25.67 (talk) 19:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The next page: DJ Train It does not contain references, labels or anything and was not erased, why? Doug Weller Theroadislong KGirlTrucker81 Miguel23T (talk) 02:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verify I totally oppose the deletion of this page knowing that there are pages like: DJ Train without deleting and that remain published without notices of elimination or debate, there is no right. Doug Weller Theroadislong KGirlTrucker81 Miguel23T (talk) 02:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)— Miguel23T (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • We have no control over any other language Wikipedias, just en.wiki. These single purpose account posts are making it more likely that the article will be deleted, as despite all their posts they haven't shown more evidence that the article meets our criteria. Doug Weller talk 06:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment New references and new content on competitions were added. The page is under construction, new data will be added over time, we will continue to investigate the artist to contribute more data, collaborating on the page so that it remains visible. Doug Weller Theroadislong KGirlTrucker81 Roumo (talk) 12:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete GNG not met, neither is WP:NMUSIC. @Roumo: Please stop adding "Verify" to your comments, and please don't add other users' signatures to your comments either. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I see no reliable sources and a google search gives almost nothing. GNG not reached.★Trekker (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Google News. Not one hit. ProQuest Music Periodicals Database - not one hit. ProQuest all databases - not one hit. Gale Canadian Periodical Index - no hits. Gale Infotrac Newsstand - no hits. I don't think I've ever encountered such an unnotable subject! Not only does there not appear to be anything to meet WP:GNG, I can't even find a reliable source that confirms they even exist! What the heck does "Verify" even mean? Based on it's usage here, it must mean that they don't know anything about Wikipedia's notability or deletion guidelines and policies. Nfitz (talk) 22:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Good sources are nonexistent, sources added are pretty bad, and the subject appears non-notable. CityOfSilver 19:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No sources. But the deleting administrator will take note of the campaign here by numerous WP:SPA users. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frangaspar. Doug Weller talk 21:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

      • Comment I've struck the posts from the confirmed socks, left Frangaspar's post and the IPs as the closing Admin/editor will likely see them as WP:DUCK editors, either socks or meatpuppets. Another sock was found after I blocked them for threatening an editor with the police, but the account didn't edit here. Doug Weller talk 09:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The librarian of Spain is in search and capture by the authorities of the police for suppressing pages of Frany Dejota. The persecution, harassment and deletion of pages in the Wikipedia of Spain that suffered the artist of this page was already denounced by the National Police and the Civil Guard the Librarian who ordered to delete the pages of the artist Frany Dejota.90.174.4.148 (talk) 11:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete totally unremarkable and non-notable "DJ" with absolutely no coverage in reliable sources. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
comment No one was saying he was a writer but it is possible to search in books for mentions of people. However, you're right, there's a total lack of coverage anywhere and Google Play is not an adequate source for establishing notability. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Frany_Dejota&oldid=1142651089"