Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/František Dominik Dobranský
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 05:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
František Dominik Dobranský[edit]
- František Dominik Dobranský (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable evidence confirming that this person ever lived. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:49, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment there's no bombproof reliable evidence that Jesus ever lived either but we have an article on him. Barney the barney barney (talk) 09:08, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This isn't Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus. This writer lived (?) in the second half of the 20th century. There's not a single independent mention of him in online resources, which is strange. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. czar · · 09:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. czar · · 09:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it seems rather hoaxish, and if not a hoax outright still does not appear to show any notability besides "known for his quotes about love.". No sources online, no results for either the English or the Czech version of the name. In addition the two sources given are general reference works for Czech (and Slovak) writers, without any actual page mentioned where references to this person could be found. It would be best to have some Czech person check this [pun intended], but considering that not even cs.wikipedia.org has anything on topic I'd assume that this is a hoax. Gmkeros (talk) 10:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I too think it is a hoax. As for the sources in the article, "Potápěč – Czech and Slovak Literature Resources" is not a very reputable source (looks like a fan site) and doesn't mention his name. The book "Česká literatura od počátků k dnešku" is a comprehensive and reliable source on Czech literature, however, it doesn't mention name of František Dominik Dobranský. I guess that the sources were copied from Czech_literature#References and pasted to the article to create the semblance of credibility. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:06, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree with above.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 11:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I too think it is a hoax. As for the sources in the article, "Potápěč – Czech and Slovak Literature Resources" is not a very reputable source (looks like a fan site) and doesn't mention his name. The book "Česká literatura od počátků k dnešku" is a comprehensive and reliable source on Czech literature, however, it doesn't mention name of František Dominik Dobranský. I guess that the sources were copied from Czech_literature#References and pasted to the article to create the semblance of credibility. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:06, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as hoax. Cavarrone (talk) 07:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no trace. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.