Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Visser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Visser[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Claim to notability is publication of four extremely obscure books (as in fails WP:BK) and hosting a website that fails WP:WEB. No independent notability claimed. jps (talk) 13:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable sourced based claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:50, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Probably delete his main claim to fame is that he writes as a critic of one Ken Wilber who writes about something called Integral theory (Ken Wilber) which is WP:FRINGE. It would take a bit of effort to look more deeply, since it is not only FRINGE, but also requires a reading knowledge of Dutch; perhaps this topic is more appropriate for Wikipedia Netherlands. Possibly redirect to Integral theory (Ken Wilber) where Visser is mentioned. E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.