Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Partnoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Jinkinson talk to me 12:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Partnoy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While Frank Partnoy seems to be a prolific writer, there does not seem to be any news articles or other sources about him that could be used to contribute to a meaningful article about him. Therefore, I don't believe he is notable enough to warrant an article. Attaboy (talk) 01:01, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator I was not familiar with WP:PROF I still wish there were articles that talked about the subject, rather than his books, but I understand the notability. Attaboy (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In fact there do appear to be enough such articles about him, such as the following reviews of his books. [1] [2] [3] [4] As well, we have this NPR article, and he has a respectable h-index of 26. [5] This seems to be enough to meet WP:GNG and the h-index enough to meet WP:PROF. Jinkinson talk to me 01:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.