Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Murphy (radio)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Murphy (radio)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to qualify for WP:CSD#A7, so WP:REFUNDed by me. I abstain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:35, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - needs better sourcing, but I believe there's a reliable claim of notability. The original A7 deletion (which I could not see until the article was restored) was initiated by a WP:SPA account (WWright0330), so this may have also been a bad faith nomination to begin with. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see no reason to delete this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VoiceofTJ (talk • contribs) 00:01, 9 April 2013 (UTC) — VoiceofTJ (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's a poorly written article with way too many subsections, but through all the aesthetically painful composition there does seem to be some established notability. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.