Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis de Souza

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 05:10, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Francis de Souza[edit]

Francis de Souza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not satisfy notability guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Notability guide. Longevity is not a criterion for notability. WWGB (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 01:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 01:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Sajjad Altaf (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A Roman Catholic priest who lived to age 90. No plausible claim of notability. A diocesan publication is not an independent source. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Aside from living to an old age, I can't see what the notability might be. Perhaps the author can work on demonstrating what else he has done? Bali88 (talk) 06:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment actually WWGB (talk · contribs) - I think longevity is a criterion for notability, but 90 years isn't a low enough percentile in the life span frequency chart for it to be notable, and that he would have had to have been at least a supercentenarian (110+ years) for this to be argued. Barney the barney barney (talk) 13:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can find no articles on Questia, Google News, or HighBeam. Jeremy112233 (talk) 14:45, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.