Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francine Ruest-Jutras

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:53, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Francine Ruest-Jutras[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Full disclosure, I'm actually the original creator of this, at a time when Wikipedia's inclusion standards for mayors were a lot looser and a lot less dependent on clearing WP:GNG than they are now -- the standard really once was that as long as the city surpassed 50K in size, the mayor was automatically in regardless of whether the sourcing in the article actually went much beyond basic verification of her existence. But that's not the standard that pertains today; the idea that the city's population constitutes an automatic inclusion freebie in and of itself has now been deprecated, and the standard is now much more strongly tied to whether the depth and breadth of sourcing gets the mayor over GNG or not regardless of the city's size. But the necessary depth and breadth of sourcing just isn't here. Bearcat (talk) 22:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for local politicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.