Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franchezca Valentina
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Franchezca Valentina[edit]
- Franchezca Valentina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PORNBIO (all nominations in single year) and WP:ENT, no indication the subject can meet the GNG or any other specialized guideline. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. Negligible reliable sourcing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:35, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails GNG; no significant coverage in independent published sources. Carrite (talk) 00:55, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as does not meet WP:PORNSTAR. No prejudice to recreation if subject wins a major award or stars in a "groundbreaking feature", naturally. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 12:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.