Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frances Borowsky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 22:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Frances Borowsky[edit]
- Frances Borowsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BIO, WP:CREATIVE, and WP:MUSICBIO. sounds overly self promotional for someone that has achieved little notable. only 1 relevant article in gnews [1]. LibStar (talk) 05:43, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. An earlier version of the article here includes a number of quotes from reviews in newspapers which apparently weren't indexed by Google News - but remember that references don't have to be available for free online to be valid. And if a newspaper in Poland reviews a performance, this is evidence in a reliable source of a tour. -- Eastmain (talk) 07:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- the references still need to be verified, they could be made up. LibStar (talk) 21:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 11:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Gazeta Wyborcza and The Jakarta Post, the two major publications cited in the version of the article linked by Eastmain, both have searchable online archives, but I can't find any references to the subject in either: [2][3]. Without publication dates I don't think we can accept these as sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If you search the Jakarta Post for just "Borowsky", you find a reference to the upcoming concert that was quoted in the old version, but not the actual review.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Simply unnotable as a classical performer. Eusebeus (talk) 14:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - hasn't established her notability firmly yet. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless more evidence of notability is provided. --Deskford (talk) 22:08, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.