Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fr. Tim Gavin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fr. Tim Gavin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:CLERGY. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My vote is to delete. Does not meet Notability - needs significant coverage in a reliable source. No sources used in article. --Michael Powerhouse (talk) 19:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON; he was ordained only four years ago. Also, this is a completely uncited BLP, and will likely fail WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete although this is not "too soon". This is he is a non-notable school chaplain, and not even on a course that would make him notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a run-of-the-mill clergyman. Could well be speedy delete under A7. St Anselm (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.