Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fourseven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G11) by Maile66. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fourseven[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like an A7/G11 advert by a COI author. The source material seems focussed on the startup's fundraising rather than any notability to the business itself. Lacks notability. Cabayi (talk) 14:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 14:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 14:38, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 14:38, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject lacks notability. As noted above, coverage seems to focus on initial funding, not detailing the company. Meatsgains (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - puffed-up but not actually WP:CORP or WP:CORPDEPTH - David Gerard (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and this was in fact speedied before, I would have tagged sooner myself but was not interested to have it removed. None of this comes close to actual substance. SwisterTwister talk 16:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:G11 and WP:A7. KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 17:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:46, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom. Deleted previously. Author has COI. David.moreno72 16:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.