Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Parts Of The Universe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Yunshui per CSD G11 and CSD G12, with closing message of "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G11, G12. Source URL: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/20572379-four-parts-of-the-universe". (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Four Parts Of The Universe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD - article about a novel that is self-published and has very little to none secondary coverage except a single review. The only other reference is a press release by the author or his PR agent (who also created and has extensively edited the article). Does not meet WP:NBOOKS. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I couldn't find a single reliable secondary source that covered it. Clearly fails WP:NBOOKS. Kolbasz (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've tagged it as a speedy for spam, but in case it does survive by some stroke of luck it should absolutely be deleted in the long run due to a complete lack of notability. The sole review is a blog source, which doesn't count towards notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:32, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's also copyvio from the book jacket. ([1]) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.