Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four-quadrant movie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Four-quadrant movie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little has changed since this article was 'prodded' almost a year ago.[1] This page is just a dictionary entry, with insufficient sources that describe the term itself. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I've expanded it out of a dicdef to what I believe is now a viable stub. Deadbeef 04:42, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep now appears to be an extremely well referenced article. Artw (talk) 18:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's a real thing discussed in sufficient depth in reliable sources. Could possibly be merged somewhere but unless a suitable target is identified it should be kept. --Michig (talk) 08:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.