Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fotolog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate wasThe result of this dabate was Keep (10/1).May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:14, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fotolog[edit]

Relatively low Alexa rank, but stats going down every day. [1] Will not be anything resembling notable in six months. ♥♥purpl e feltangel ♥♥ 00:16, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete... promotional vanity...Dakota 00:24, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup. Over 2 and a half million Google results see [2] and nearly two million users makes it notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 00:40, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems notable enough for inclusion to me. If it becomes NN later on it can be deleted then. --ASchmoo 01:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, once notable, always notable. Kappa 11:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. Needs some clean up. PJM 14:26, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Two million users, a relatively popular photo hosting site. One of the earlier ones, being a bit eclipsed by some of the newer arrivals, but still notable enough I think. Article needs some work, but let's do that instead of deleting. —Morven 18:50, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- As a further note, outranked flickr according to Alexa until mid July. —Morven 18:52, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; clean up. --Optichan 19:58, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cleanup and expand, as it is notable. Carioca 20:45, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable site, still popular, and not dead yet. --Calton | Talk 01:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep and please do not erase this later either we should keep it forever for research reasons Yuckfoo 18:25, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep the site recently got helped out by investors and should only keep improving. Its extremely popular in Brazil . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesinclair (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.