Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FotoMagico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 22:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FotoMagico[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Product of suspected UPE. Doesn't meet the GNG. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NSOFT point 1 and WP:GNG with significant reviews in Macworld and other RS outlets including [1] and [2]. UPE issues can be dealt with by article improvement. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Notability (software) is an essay, not a notability guideline that has been approved by the community through the WP:SNG process. and other RS outlets both of your links are reviews in Macworld. Two reviews in Macworld does not meet GNG. If it did, we'd be creating an article every time Macworld reviewed a piece of software. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant notability guidelines are WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. I doubt this product has significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. MarioGom (talk) 10:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Eggishorn's sources plus the ones I've added to the article. It's not very notable, and a lot of the coverage reads like flap-copy, but it does just about get over the bar. FOARP (talk) 11:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has some RS, and has received some awards. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.