Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forward to Snow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forward to Snow[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Preliminary warning: My web browser does not pick up websites originating in Canada well (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contrived as not my finest AfD hour). However, there honestly seems to be basically no coverage in reliable sources for this EP. Generally, non-notable albums and EPs are redirect to the band article, so I'll suggest a redirect to Elevator (band). Hog Farm (talk) 05:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 05:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 05:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and/or redirect per nom. Once upon a time, albums (including EPs) were automatically accepted as notable enough for Wikipedia articles so long as the band that had recorded them had a Wikipedia article. That's no longer the way it works, however: our notability criteria for music have been tightened up considerably in the 14 years since this was created, and albums now have to have a much stronger claim of notability — fairly wide critical attention, notable awards, etc. — than just existing. But I can find nothing on either Google or ProQuest that would bolster the notability here, so a standalone article is not warranted under contemporary wikistandards. In fact, even the band's full albums are all pretty questionable too — none of them are making any claim of notability stronger than the fact that they exist either, and they're all either minimally sourced or entirely unsourced. Bearcat (talk) 16:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Elevator (band) per the nom. Aoba47 (talk) 02:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since it seems like the Elevator (band) article will soon be deleted, then I have adjusted my vote to delete since there will no longer be a viable redirect target. Aoba47 (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Elevator (band) -- It looks like this one fell through the cracks. The article has no sources for a reason: there aren't any except basic retail/streaming entries that only indicate the album's basic existence, and a few mentions at blogs. Not enough to confer notability. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 22:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am in Canada and there are no reviews of the work. Not a likely search term, and the search tool would pick it up in the band's article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.