Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forty-nine character virtues

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 01:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Forty-nine character virtues[edit]

List of vague adjectives with no connecting ideas or explanations. Nothing noteworthy to keep and the ideas are directly copied from the author's personal webpage[1] save biblical references. This article should be deleted and the link to the "Forty-nine character virtues" should be placed Bill Gothard's wikipedia page for interested parties. Arbustoo 06:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, though take out the actual list itself before doing so -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you mean? It's just a list. Arbustoo 06:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - good point. Delete. --DDerby-(talk) 08:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Since most of the article is the list, a mention should be added in Bill Gothard's article that the list exists, and a redirect left on this article. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 09:11, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all It's original research, a more complex google search for "character virtues" "Bill Gothard" -wikipedia gives TWO results and they are both unauthoritative. —This user has left wikipedia 08:47 2006-02-02
- Comment - he seems to call them "character qualities", as per this link, and "character qualities" "bill gothard" -wikipedia on Google has 170 results, which is a bit better. It doesn't seem like original research. Snurks ^{T C} 04:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Royboycrashfan 17:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 17:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Αchille. KillerChihuahua^?!? 00:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Achille. Joe 02:43, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of Achille's points. --Kinu 02:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge; or Delete (essentially) with commented external link to this list Davilla 09:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as too crufty to justify a merge. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 10:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Prodego ^talk 14:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Eusebeus 18:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Achille. --Wingsandsword 08:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Delete Harvestdancer 18:03, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.