Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortress Maximus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fortress Maximus[edit]
- Fortress Maximus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This collection of characters does not establish notability independent of Transformers through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details and toy details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 10:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Gets enough Google hits to make notability questionable, but none of them satisfy me enough to conclusively establish notability. Since the article doesn't really help things either (fan sites and dead links), I'm leaning toward deletion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:58, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unlikely there is substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.