Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortnight Calendar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted (G11, promotional) by Bbb23. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 13:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fortnight Calendar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Made up in one day. PROD removed by author. reddogsix (talk) 14:34, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Indisputably original research not discussed in any reliable, independent sources. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Cullen above. Fitnr (talk) 19:34, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- the only source is something receently published on wikipedia.com, surely that is far too close to WP:OR to count as a source. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and snow close. Wikipedia is not for things you come up with one day. Considering that this is something the user is trying to promote on Wikipedia, this might be speedyable as promotion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged it as a speedy for promotion, as it's highly unlikely this will survive AfD and it would be better to just stick a fork in it now. Ultimately this is something that was added by the original editor in hopes of it getting notice and discussion. I'm all for new ideas, but Wikipedia is not the place to promote something you came up with. If it gains coverage in RS then one day it can be re-added, but not before that point. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyogirl79 stuck in a fork, and now, it is well and truly done. Well done. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.