Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Wayne United Soccer Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:07, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Wayne United Soccer Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Request made by a member of the organisation's staff (VRTS ticket # 2013072710003801). It is asserted that the article contents are inaccurate and that the organisation should not be included in Wikipedia.

No opinion. L Faraone 18:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - plays in the USL Premier Development League and therefore considered notable; the article simply needs improving/updating. Giant Snowman 08:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- The name of this organization is not correct, nor the allegations of a "buy out". I would suggest letting the organization create their page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SOCCERGIRL13 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We generally don't accept articles written by an organisation or people close to it, see WP:COI and WP:AUTO. If the issue is specific factual errors rather than the notability of the organisation, you can make suggestions on the article talk page to have them corrected. L Faraone 18:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Update - It clearly is in need of improvement but I'd expect nothing less for an organisation that is so newly formed. => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 17:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

'Keep - It is a new organization, meaning it has little history and info available. As it grows and becomes more notable it will be a good article. JacobEditor 18:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Club plays in a FPL and is therefore considered notable. Fenix down (talk) 13:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.