Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forever Red

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 'Redirect to season article. Delete would only create a redlink beckoning to be created... Fram (talk) 12:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forever Red[edit]

articles about individual Tv episodes are generally not notable. delete

This is notable because this is a special, groundbreaking, and important episode in the history of power rangers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rick lay95 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge to episodes page. Sales Actor MSK (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this does have real-world context, as Rick lay95 says. JuJube (talk) 17:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
merge to episodes page. Hammer1980·^talk 19:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Merge, unless sources can be found that document the episode's notability. The episode itself can be used as a source to confirm the information provided - but, without asserting or proving notability, that doesn't matter. ZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 19:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I believe that Forever Red was and is a significant Episode in the Power Rangers Universe in a matter very similar to PROO's Once a Ranger. However, it does need major improvements. I would suggest seeing what the Once a Ranger article has for content and copy that manner of writing and improve on the Forever Red article.[[User:Nsmith4658|スミスナサニア
This is a notable enough episode to have it's own article.User:monkeyjb1988

ル]] (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 07:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete Sdoll555 03:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you elaborate? Please remember these are discussions, not votes. :) See WP:JUSTAVOTE. The Evil Spartan 04:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep article satisfies notability standards. AfD clearly appears to be a bad faith nomination. Alansohn 18:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It might be notable in the PR fanbase but having this is like writing an article on the 100th episode of FOX's 24 or CBS's the King of Queens. ZordZapper (talk) 21:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of the most notable Power Ranger episodes ever. Plus, the OP might have a bias against Power Rangers because any other show's episodes, no matter how notable, get an article. Why does Power Rangers only get articles for their most notable episodes? ^---SilentRAGE! 02:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless reliable sources proving notability are provided. Currently the article, like many comments here, is unsourced original research.. Nuttah (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.