Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forever Oeuvre (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 03:37, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forever Oeuvre[edit]

Forever Oeuvre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article exhibits no notability (WP:NMUSIC), and is not verifiable with reliable sources. The article has previously gone through an AfD process (see here), but was recreated. The recreated version did not improve upon the previous version, but the article was kept. Just as a starting point for the notability issue, the band hasn't released anything since their first EP, no entry at AllMusic nor do they have any other professional music review listings or notable media coverage. For the RS issues, there are only 3 citations, none of which appear to be reliable. Jacedc (talk) 22:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination, and the prior AFD, which I still believe applies. The individual members that are notable in relation to the band are either only marginally related to the band, or marginally notable themselves - no one of any sort of star power like Ozzy Ozborne or Slash were part of it, for example. The band output very little music, which didn't chart, and they didn't receive much in the way of detailed coverage. Sergecross73 msg me 18:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no indication of notability. Note, I was invited to this discussion by the nominator. rʨanaɢ (talk) 02:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.