Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forest Trail Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Kudpung per CSD G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forest Trail Academy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. Most of the sources are primary or databases. No in-depth independent coverage. Not necessarily a reason to delete, the creator User:Ashleyfta is a blocked sock part of an undisclosed paid editing org. GreenC 15:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC) *Delete as artspam and per nomination.. This is not a mainstream school. The major article contributor has a flagrant COI. The article is written likea pronotional brochure. Typically characteristic in all points of the Orangemoody-style (undisclosed paid editing org.) promotional pieces masquerading as articles. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.