Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forensic Network
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep after improvements made by Coffee4me asserting/solidifying the notability of the organization.--JForget 23:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Forensic Network[edit]
- Forensic Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No claim of notability in article. Oo7565 (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This would appear to be some kind of government foundation in Scotland that deals with mental health issues in prisons. That strikes me as presumptively notable, not the sort of thing that generates conflict of interest issues, and ultimately sourceable. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete unless it can be shown to have notability independent from the NHS. There are going to necessarily be lots of programs like this within a nationwide health agency and we aren't in the business of documenting all of them. --Dhartung | Talk 20:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 20:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The organization is notable, having been chosen to host the 9th annual International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services in 2009. I expanded, cited, and copyedited the article, plus left notice at WikiProject Scotland regarding opportunity to comment on the afd nom article. Coffee4me (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —Mais oui! (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. as per Coffee4me. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep --MacRusgail (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.