Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreign aid to Thailand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. /No Consensus. A third re-listing won't help to find one and there have been no arguments foe deletion apart from the nom. A possible merge can be discussed on the relevant talk pages. StarM 21:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign aid to Thailand[edit]

A pointless article that lacks sufficient notability and purpose. Either delete or merge with Thailand. Adamc714 (talk) 19:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see how anyone could say this topic is not notable. There isn't much in the article yet but there is no reason to throw it away. You could merge it with Thailand but I don't think this material deserves such prominence. Juzhong (talk) 01:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Minor topic related to the country with no stand-alone notability. Either Thailand or Economy of Thailand are fit articles to accommodate this information. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 15:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, could be expanded in the future. There are 5 more articles in Asia titled "Foreign aid for $country_name", and a "Foreign aid by country" category. MaxVT (talk) 15:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 15:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A bit on the short side, but this can be expanded and it is referenced making some notable claims like "Historically Thailand was one of the biggest receipients of Japanese overseas aid". I can't see how this would be not notable. (Of course, not every country should have a foreign aid to <country> article about it, but in this case it makes sense since it actually has content to tell. Mgm|^(talk) 17:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.