Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forced Cranial Removal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forced Cranial Removal[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And another non-notable compilation album by Soul Crusher. Again, I am surprised this hasn't been deleted or at least tagged for notability yet. But I tagged it and I also nominate it for Afd, so here we go. The only thing that might at least establish some notability is the fact that this was released on a label that has its own article - although the sourcing isn't great on that article either. The vast majority of Soul Crusher's compilation albums are released on unknown, underground labels, so it's a bit refreshing to see a label which has its own article. Anyways, the sourcing is the same old junk: blank Allmusic page (track listing + user reviews), blogs/unreliable looking sites, a catalog of albums, a discogs page and the album booklet. I can't comprehend why Soul Crusher thinks these are acceptable sources, and can't comprehend why did he thought writing articles on all of these non-notable albums and bands was a great idea. It seems to me like he was a newcomer who didn't bother to read the rules of WP and he opted to do things on his own. No wonder he got indeffed. We are still under the weight of these articles tho, as I have a suspicion that there are many more, and this is just the beginning like I said at a previous Afd. So, to keep it short: just another non-notable album. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Barely found anything about the compilation album. ASTIG😎 _{(HAPPY NEW YEAR!)} 17:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article has some sources but they are either empty database entries (even the AllMusic page) or basic statements on the album's existence. Unlike some other non-notable compilations recently tracked down by GhostDestroyer, this one happens to include notable bands. Each of their articles can very briefly list their appearance on this comp. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 21:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the only thing that establishes at least some notability is the fact that this comp has notable bands, and it was released on a notable label. I still think it's not notable on its own though. This info can be included in the bands' and the label's article. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough in-depth sourcing to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.