Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FootyLight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FootyLight[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable website and mobile app with no significant coverage in reliable sources. GSS ^💬 08:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 08:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 10:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 11:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - All of the sources read as promotions; can't find any additional sources for this app. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 16:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines... Spyder212 (talk) 23:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This app has not yet established any significant notability, and the article reads like a promotional blurb.TH1980 (talk) 05:33, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.