Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Footprints Recruiting (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Footprints Recruiting (2nd nomination)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Last AfD in 2010 ended as no consensus with 2 editors arguing there is coverage - all I see are mentions in passing, i.e. WP:GOOGLETEST. At best, I found one source that is about something the company did rather then just naming it in passing in the ESL industry context, [1], and I don't think that suffices to make it notable. It is just your average SME doing its stuff. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I too am unconvinced by what's there - David Gerard (talk) 23:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I frankly consider this speedy material. SwisterTwister talk 03:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.