Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Footprints (song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Babylon and On. Randykitty (talk) 12:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Footprints (song)[edit]

Footprints (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Prodded and deprodded with the edit comment, "it's a Squeeze single just like all the others that have articles" WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS also apply. Richhoncho (talk) 10:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I created this page ages ago, along with the other various Squeeze singles. Notable band, notable album, but as far as I can tell this single never charted, despite being later included on several "hits" compilations. I'll defer to others to judge whether there could be enough substance here to justify retaining the page. Mrmctorso (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It's doing no harm. If it were a stub or just marked 'unreferenced' it could exist without incident. If we delete this, we'll have to start deleting most of the singles in Template:Squeeze. Fuddle (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Fails WP:NSONGS. Azealia911 talk 22:53, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 19:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Babylon and On which is the singles album - Obviously fails NSONG but 9 times out of 10 singles get redirected to albums anyway, –Davey2010Talk 01:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.