Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foody World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this company does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foody World[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local market which gained notoriety for a case of Listeria last October. Does not pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Deprodded without rationale or improvement.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - All coverage I found was based on the one event, not significant enough to establish notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't seem to be any sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH; debatably could fall under WP:ILLCON. First link that pops up for me that isn't about the outbreak is about a unrelated store with a similar name in Toronto. If the outbreak is notable name the article after it, not the company, like the 2008 Canada listeriosis outbreak. Fuebaey (talk) 04:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree, I don't see how a single event at this store makes it notable enough for an article. Clawsyclaw (talk) 08:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 05:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.