Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Following the Red Asphalt Road:Zombie Apocalypse The Musical

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 00:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Following the Red Asphalt Road:Zombie Apocalypse The Musical[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a book with no independent sources. A self-published book where the article is written by the books author. Fails WP:NBOOK in all. Ben Ben (talk) 17:06, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I had placed a Prod notice on this article with the rationale "No evidence that this self-published book meets the notability criteria." The Prod notice was removed in order to bring the article to AfD; I'm not sure why? But no matter, as per my Prod rationale, I see no notability here. AllyD (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry Ally, this wasn't my intention. Had the article for a few minutes on my screen before I tagged it for AfD. Don't know, why I didn't get a warning from Twinkle.--Ben Ben (talk) 17:22, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Ben Ben (talk) 17:19, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete self published book, with no holdings in worldcat. I have just speedy deleted the article on the author as A7, no indication of significance; we can't do it here; but perhaps we can regard it as G11promotion for the book. DGG ( talk ) 17:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The intention of this article was surely promotional, without a doubt.--Ben Ben (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Someone might also want to look into the image in the article as well. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 18:28, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and probably snow close as this doesn't have a chance of surviving. This is pretty obviously an attempt at promotion, but the article is just neutral enough reading to where I don't think we can give it a mercifully swift end via speedy. There are no sources out there that would show notability for this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.