Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog photography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Blatant copyvio of http://kpepphotography.blogspot.com/2011/10/photographing-in-fog.html Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:01, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fog photography[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be deleted as it is like a guide.See WP:NOTHOWTO.Wikipedia should not be used as a how to step by step guide.Therefore article should be deleted Dipankan001 (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As above. Could have been proded Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 15:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - Probably qualifies for WP:G12 with copyright violations of at least (Redacted) (an apparently blacklisted website) and this. It seems to be taken from several sources. I would nominate it now but I'm not sure if there's anything salvagable in there (non-copyvio text) that would save it from a G12. OlYeller^Talktome 17:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.