Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:31, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page creator is a WP:single purpose account and the other non-trivial contributor may be too. The page has faced deletion before (speedy, PROD, PROD) but the SPAC contested the PROD and the rest was dismissed on procedure.
Does not demonstrate its notability: all sources are from 2017 (WP:NTEMP) and so the coverage isn't significant (WP:NSUSTAINED); its 4 reviews don't mention any significance to the field (WP:NSOFTWARE) and are from sites that review software all the time (WP:MILL is linked in NSOFT); ProductHunt listings, HackerNews comments and misc software sites are not WP:RS, even if two of them get WP articles.
The fact that it is proprietary payware plus the shoddy claim to notability makes me think of an WP:ADMASQ, that only lasted this long because nobody bothered enough to bring it here. — Mignof (talk | contribs) 19:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Software. — Mignof (talk | contribs) 19:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsupported software, no longer in development, no sources found. Oaktree b (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.