Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flussonic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flussonic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is notable software. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree. This doesn't seem notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article fails Wikipedia:Notability (software) as written. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A Google search only found download sites and user-generated sources. Fails WP:GNG. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 05:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This is a 'snow delete' situation. An admin should be able to just take care of this right now, given the backlog of other deletion cases that we have. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me what to add to this page to prevent from deletion? User:Maxlapshin 11:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxlapshin: Please see WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. -- intgr [talk] 10:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches found nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.