Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flowergrazer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flowergrazer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fictional character's article states that "In the book only few lines (sic) are dedicated to Flowergrazer, thus we know few details of him". Enough said. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A character that appears in only one chapter of a book - I cannot think of a character with that few appearances who actually deserves an article (WP:NOTABILITY). Neither does this one. – sgeureka ^t•c 09:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even notable in the book itself. Hard to imagine that there would be third-party sources outside the book that could WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.