Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floortje Smit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — neuro^(talk) 18:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Floortje Smit[edit]

Contestant who came second in Dutch Pop Idol, whose album "peaked" at number 43 in the charts, and whose article's only reference is a single website. I can't see anything here not worthy of deletion. role^player 22:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I won't vote, but I did a little work on the article. Ms. Smit, apparently, is a diva. Drmies (talk) 00:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Since the article now contains links to at least 3 reliable Dutch newspapers she meets WP:GNG and she should stay for that alone, but according to this (admittedly unreliable) source several more of her songs charted. The Album Top 100 is a notable Dutch chart and whether it peaked on #1 or #43 is irrelevant. WP:MUSIC only says it should be charted and has no limits on where in the chart it is supposed to be. (Incidentally, it stayed there for 6 weeks). - Mgm|^(talk) 00:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MGM, do you have access to any of those pixies? ;) Drmies (talk) 00:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per MGM. And per chart success. And improved article.--Judo112 (talk) 13:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the nomination where in place before the improvements of this article. I also know that Floortje is notable beyond a one time event.--MarkusBJoke (talk) 14:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strident KEEP. And thank you to MGM for doing a "cursory" search. Nice job! Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:21, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.