Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flo Meredith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (Non-admin closure) Swarm^(Talk) 03:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flo Meredith[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to meet notability guidelines. Character is non-integral single-or very limited-appearance character from The Mary Tyler Moore Show. Article is completely original research. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~Weak Keep change to weak keep per PF. The coverage in books as "Aunt Flo" seem to have enough to at least produce a quality section in the list or as a standalone article. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - You must have not bothered to actually check. There are tons of books that discuss her. [1][2][3] You may just be too young (I know I am), but the Mary Tyler Moore Show was so huge back in the day, even small characters are going to have significant coverage. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 02:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If these sources exist, why does the article not include them, and why does the article read like fancruft prose? Sottolacqua (talk) 03:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Why? Why not. Please feel free to add them as its always best to address the surmountable issues through normal editing. That no one has yet addressed concerns is a reason to do it... but not to decide to delete an article because somebody else has not yet done the work. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as an easily sourcable character, or at the very least consider a WP:Merge to The Mary Tyler Moore Show. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.