Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flightexec

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flightexec[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to be anything more than a tiny aircraft charter company, despite being almost 40 years old. There's not much likelihood of meeting WP:GNG, or WP:NCORP in particular. (the mentions are in air industry publications only). Would we keep an article about a truck company with 7 trucks, or a bus company with 7 buses? I very much doubt it. Sionk (talk) 22:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete Notable in the region (Canada) and I found references in multiple languages. Obviously an airline company would be notable within the industry and trucking industry within trucking. I think it is historically important but not having references online due to being established in pre-internet period. Mia Watson (talk) 16:53, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:15, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possibly speedy as A7. In any case, does not meet WP:NCORP; promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.