Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flat honing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems to be a notable process and not spam. Fences&Windows 21:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flat honing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: I'm submitting this in good faith for the following IP. tedder (talk) 07:51, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable metalworking process thats just the same as honing only sold by one company. Only real contributor is user:flathone which is a bad username and COI anyway. (later, posted the following)

This is just company spam from user:flathone and should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.246.168.11 (talk) 16:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: The notability has been asserted with multiple references. The process is legit and offered by more than company. There isn't any spam in the article. Wizard191 (talk) 19:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep appears to be adequately sourced. I'd think it should be shorter and merged elsewhere, but that's for those that know more about the subject than I. Hobit (talk) 03:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has about ten pages of coverage in this book and plenty more in others found by the Google Books search linked above. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.