Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flash mob bang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flash mob bang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A form of a flash mob; no references or evidence of notability (or even that it's an established term) since the article was created in 2007. (Incomplete nomination by an unregistered user.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, unsourced, no sign of notability. Hairhorn (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it even worth merging? - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-possibly not, especially if no sources turn up. Hairhorn (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No cverage in reliable sources. Merging unsourced, material is problematic. -- Whpq (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.