The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:43, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE Simply gripping, but still adcruft. Stu 22:27, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. You can’t much more blatant advertising than this one. ♠DanMS 02:21, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
