Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlashForward (season 1)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep/Merge: NAC after merging List of FlashForward episodes and FlashForward (season 1) with FlashForward (TV series). I agree with the rationale offered here, and a couple of others obviously do as well, but taking that rational and coming up with deletion as a solution isn't appropriate. We'll need both the list and the individual season articles in a year or so, there's just not enough content right now to justify spinning material out into separate articles, is all.
— V = I * R (talk to Ω) 03:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FlashForward (season 1)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reason to have a season episode for a series that is only one season. We have List of FlashForward episodes and everything can go there. We usually create season articles if the season has something more to give than the normal list of episodes. Magioladitis (talk) 18:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: So nominate for merge, not delete... - BalthCat (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge what? The important stuff is already in the list. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the episode list on List of FlashForward episodes only contains: {{:FlashForward (season 1)}} the episode list would be gone if you just delete FlashForward (season 1). So, yes for merge, no to delete. _Xeworlebi ^(t•c) 23:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then we delete the list and move this to the position of the list. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into episode list. Only one season so the information is fine there. There is a great overlap having the two articles and reducing the content in the episode list (as would be done by having two articles) will just make there be less of a reason to have it. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 03:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Too much duplication and too little user friendliness with this spread across three articles when two will do. Drmargi (talk) 03:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.