Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flaming Dr. Pepper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep

Flaming Dr. Pepper[edit]

Non-notable cocktail. WP:V -- no sources for any claims made on page. Quale 23:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the Simpsons reference is unfounded but I believe the cocktail is notable enough to keep. Evidence of this is the link from Bacardi 151. 137.122.66.106 00:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~. over 500 unique google hits on "flaming dr pepper," almost all of them relevant. Seems notable enough to me. Note that we also have Flaming Dr Pepper, which is the proper title since "Dr Pepper" does not have a period. Simpsons reference should be verified or dropped--the drink is notable enough either way. dbtfz^talk 03:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I should have said merge to Flaming Dr Pepper. dbtfz ^talk 03:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Redwolf24 (talk) 20:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Most definetly a notable cocktail if only because it is banned in many bars. Kntrabssi 19:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a soft redirect off wiki is not an acceptable alternative. ALKIVAR™ 05:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.