Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishsticks and Milk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fishsticks and Milk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seem to have at least gotten some attention, but fails to garner the multiple reliable sources required to satisfy WP:N. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Here is a list of articles pertaining to events put on by Fishsticks & Milk.

11/06/2009 http://mywebtimes.com/archives/ottawa/display.php?id=391432

11/25/2009 http://ottawadelivered.com/News/story-News.cfm?id=1071

12/07/2009 http://mywebtimes.com/archives/ottawa/display.php?id=393327&query=fishsticks

12/13/2009 http://mywebtimes.com/archives/ottawa/display.php?id=393735&query=tyler

12/15/2009 http://mywebtimes.com/archives/ottawa/display.php?id=393927&query=fishsticks

12/18/2009 http://www.ottawadelivered.com/News/story-News.cfm?id=1286

12/30/2009 http://mywebtimes.com/archives/ottawa/display.php?id=394760

1/01/2010 http://www.ottawadelivered.com/News/story-News.cfm?id=1368

As of January 2010, "Fishsticks & Milk Inc." has become an official corporation. We are currently in the process of becoming a non for profit organization.

Fishsticks & Milk is officially registered and recognized as a Non-For-Profit Organization. More information about the group can be found here:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Fishsticks-And-Milk/153046179838

And here:

http://www.youtube.com/user/FishsticksAndMilk

Another news story has just been published here:

2/07/2010 http://www.ottawadelivered.com/News/story-News.cfm?id=1715 And official website is in the works. While the page needs to be cleaned up and organized, I think there are certainly enough resources (and enough information) for the group to deserve its own page.

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.144.245.155 (talk) 06:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be sure to provide informaton concerning your conflict of interest on the article's Talk page every time you edit. Woogee (talk) 06:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:WEB. Woogee (talk) 06:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing here. Geschichte (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely fails the notability guidelines of WP:ORG, which states that an organisation is notable if "it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." It goes on to say that "trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. " There are only a handful of low quality news links to this organisation and no other citations anywhere. It has to go! Wikipeterproject (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.