Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Lutheran Church (Ellington, Connecticut)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 15:30, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First Lutheran Church (Ellington, Connecticut)[edit]
- First Lutheran Church (Ellington, Connecticut) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this church. Joe Chill (talk) 23:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While all churches are spiritually notable, there is nothing to indicate that this should have a page of its own on Wikipedia. WP:WEBHOST pretty well sums it up. Mandsford (talk) 14:49, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge - I can't find anything useful from reliable sources after making a concerted effort to find such sources online. The only relevant references talk about it in context of the historic area of Ellington, Connecticut. Bearian (talk) 16:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Ellington, Connecticut. This is usually the best solution for local facilities. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:25, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/Merge to Ellington, Connecticut. I do not think that this building is sufficiently notable on its own to merit inclusion, due to what appears to be a lack of non-trivial third party coverage on the topic. Cocytus [»talk«] 02:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.