Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Lady of Mato Grosso do Sul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First Lady of Mato Grosso do Sul[edit]

First Lady of Mato Grosso do Sul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am taking this to AFD as I think PROD will be contested. I think this title is not notable enough per WP:GNG. While the governors of Brazilian states are notable, I do not think their wives are automatically notable. Being the first lady of Mato Grosso do Sul have no special notability when compared to other first ladies from other states. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, this is effectively an honorary title, none of the holders are of themselves notable and fails WP:GNG. WCMemail 23:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NLIST. LibStar (talk) 02:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Sources indicate the title is in use, see here or here (both in Portuguese) show that the term "First Lady of XXX" is in common use for states of Brazil. Wikipedia does not require that individual entries on a list be all notable, merely that the subject of the list is a real thing, and the First Lady of various Brazilian states is. --Jayron32 18:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Possibly should be moved to List of first ladies of Mato Grosso do Sul. As Jayron32 noted, the title primeiras-damas de Mato Grosso do Sul is in use and found in media coverage of the office holder. The individual first lady may not meet the bar of GNG, but the office should clear it for a list article like this. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 19:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - while I understand the keep !votes, I am not persuaded that this title meets the conditions as per WP:NLIST. Onel5969 TT me 15:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.