Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First General Bank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

First General Bank

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

First General Bank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 01:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. SL93 (talk) 01:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Rlink2 (talk) 18:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Agree with nom, no coverage and seems more ad than info. ContentEditman (talk) 20:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. The only possibly reliable source I could find is this article, which has no byline, has a promotional tone, and could be a press release:
  2. "台資社區銀行當道 大通爾灣分行擴大營業" [Taiwan-funded community banks dominate, First General Bank's Irvine branch expands business]. Taiwan Daily (in Chinese). 2019-10-03. Archived from the original on 2022-04-18. Retrieved 2022-04-18.
  First General Bank (traditional Chinese: 大通銀行; simplified Chinese: 大通银行) does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 10:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Cunard (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.